Skip to main content

Fern Bay vs Hamilton North

Property investment comparison - Fern Bay, NSW 2295 vs Hamilton North, NSW 2292

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fern Bay wins 1, Hamilton North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFern BayHamilton North
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$815K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%3.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%4.35%
1-year house growth+6.5%+4.7%
3-year house growth+10.6%+17.5%
Vacancy rate1.0%0.4%
Population4,046934

Fern Bay vs Hamilton North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Fern Bay and $1.1M in Hamilton North.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.50% in Fern Bay and 3.50% in Hamilton North, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Fern Bay and +4.7% in Hamilton North, so recent momentum favours Fern Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Fern Bay houses are +10.6% and Hamilton North houses +17.5%, so Hamilton North has compounded faster than Fern Bay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Hamilton North and 1.0% in Fern Bay, so landlords in Hamilton North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fern Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,046 against 934, roughly 4.3 times the size of Hamilton North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fern Bay for recent price momentum, Hamilton North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison