Fern Bay vs Lucknow
Property investment comparison - Fern Bay, NSW 2295 vs Lucknow, NSW 2800
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fern Bay wins 3, Lucknow wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fern Bay | Lucknow |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $815K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.50% | 2.62% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.00% | 3.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +6.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +10.6% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.0% | 3.4% |
| Population | 4,046 | 277 |
Fern Bay vs Lucknow: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Fern Bay and $1.1M in Lucknow.
On cash flow, Fern Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.50%, compared with 2.62% in Lucknow, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Fern Bay and 3.4% in Lucknow, so landlords in Fern Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Fern Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,046 against 277, roughly 15 times the size of Lucknow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fern Bay for rental income, Fern Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison