Fernvale vs Herne Hill
Property investment comparison - Fernvale, VIC 3701 vs Herne Hill, VIC 3218
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fernvale wins 0, Herne Hill wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fernvale | Herne Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $805K | $800K |
| Median unit price | - | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.32% | 3.57% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.90% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +12.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 11.9% | 2.1% |
| Population | 1,101 | 3,507 |
Fernvale vs Herne Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $805K in Fernvale and $800K in Herne Hill, so Herne Hill is the cheaper entry point, with Fernvale houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Herne Hill leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 2.32% in Fernvale, a gap of 1.25 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Herne Hill and 11.9% in Fernvale, so landlords in Herne Hill face less competition for tenants.
Herne Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,507 against 1,101, roughly 3.2 times the size of Fernvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Herne Hill for rental income, Herne Hill for a lower purchase price, Herne Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison