Skip to main content

Ferny Hills vs Middle Ridge

Property investment comparison - Ferny Hills, QLD 4055 vs Middle Ridge, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ferny Hills wins 1, Middle Ridge wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFerny HillsMiddle Ridge
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.33%4.10%
1-year house growth+13.7%+16.6%
3-year house growth+39.5%+43.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population8,7267,595

Ferny Hills vs Middle Ridge: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Ferny Hills and $1.2M in Middle Ridge, so Middle Ridge is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.7% in Ferny Hills and +16.6% in Middle Ridge, so recent momentum favours Middle Ridge, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Ferny Hills houses are +39.5% and Middle Ridge houses +43.2%, so Middle Ridge has compounded faster than Ferny Hills over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Middle Ridge and 1.6% in Ferny Hills, so landlords in Middle Ridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Ferny Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,726 against 7,595, larger than Middle Ridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Middle Ridge for a lower purchase price, Middle Ridge for recent price momentum, Middle Ridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison