Skip to main content

Ferny Hills vs Redland Bay

Property investment comparison - Ferny Hills, QLD 4055 vs Redland Bay, QLD 4165

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ferny Hills wins 3, Redland Bay wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFerny HillsRedland Bay
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.33%3.84%
1-year house growth+13.7%+16.6%estimate
3-year house growth+39.5%-
Vacancy rate1.6%1.8%
Population8,72617,056

Ferny Hills vs Redland Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Ferny Hills and $1.2M in Redland Bay, so Ferny Hills is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Redland Bay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.39%, compared with 3.30% in Ferny Hills, a gap of 0.09 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.7% in Ferny Hills and +16.6% in Redland Bay (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Redland Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Ferny Hills and 1.8% in Redland Bay, so landlords in Ferny Hills face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Redland Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,056 against 8,726, larger than Ferny Hills; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Redland Bay for rental income, Ferny Hills for a lower purchase price, Redland Bay for recent price momentum, Ferny Hills for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison