Figtree vs Floraville
Property investment comparison - Figtree, NSW 2525 vs Floraville, NSW 2280
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Figtree wins 1, Floraville wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Figtree | Floraville |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $785K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.14% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.50% |
| 1-year house growth | +7.4%estimate | +8.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Population | 12,335 | 1,814 |
Figtree vs Floraville: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Figtree and $1.2M in Floraville, so Figtree is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +7.4% in Figtree (an estimate) and +8.2% in Floraville (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Floraville, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Floraville and 2.0% in Figtree, so landlords in Floraville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Figtree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,335 against 1,814, roughly 7 times the size of Floraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Figtree for a lower purchase price, Floraville for recent price momentum, Floraville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison