Skip to main content

Findon vs Meadows

Property investment comparison - Findon, SA 5023 vs Meadows, SA 5201

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Findon wins 2, Meadows wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFindonMeadows
Median house price$1.0M$1M
Median unit price$645K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.66%
Gross rental yield (units)4.73%6.44%
1-year house growth+14.3%+13.8%
3-year house growth+33.9%+43.0%
Vacancy rate1.0%1.1%
Population6,9971,717

Findon vs Meadows: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Findon and $1M in Meadows, so Meadows is the cheaper entry point, with Findon houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Findon sits at a median of $645K against $325K in Meadows, which makes Meadows the more affordable unit market and Findon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.3% in Findon and +13.8% in Meadows, so recent momentum favours Findon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Findon houses are +33.9% and Meadows houses +43.0%, so Meadows has compounded faster than Findon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Findon and 1.1% in Meadows, so landlords in Findon face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Findon is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,997 against 1,717, roughly 4.1 times the size of Meadows; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Meadows for a lower purchase price, Findon for recent price momentum, Findon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison