Finnie vs Logan Village
Property investment comparison - Finnie, QLD 4350 vs Logan Village, QLD 4207
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Finnie wins 2, Logan Village wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Finnie | Logan Village |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Median unit price | - | $580K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 2.58% | 3.07% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.84% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +47.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 2.1% |
| Population | 69 | 5,316 |
Finnie vs Logan Village: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.3M in Finnie and $1.3M in Logan Village, so Finnie is the cheaper entry point.
On cash flow, Logan Village leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.07%, compared with 2.58% in Finnie, a gap of 0.49 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Finnie and 2.1% in Logan Village, so landlords in Finnie face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Logan Village is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,316 against 69, roughly 77 times the size of Finnie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Logan Village for rental income, Finnie for a lower purchase price, Finnie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison