Skip to main content

Fitzroy vs Tanybryn

Property investment comparison - Fitzroy, VIC 3065 vs Tanybryn, VIC 3249

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fitzroy wins 3, Tanybryn wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFitzroyTanybryn
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$810K$405K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%1.47%
Gross rental yield (units)-3.66%
1-year house growth-10.2%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%1.0%
Population10,43115

Fitzroy vs Tanybryn: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Fitzroy and $1.6M in Tanybryn, so Fitzroy is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Fitzroy sits at a median of $810K against $405K in Tanybryn, which makes Tanybryn the more affordable unit market and Fitzroy the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fitzroy leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.60%, compared with 1.47% in Tanybryn, a gap of 2.13 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Fitzroy and 1.0% in Tanybryn, so landlords in Fitzroy face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fitzroy is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,431 against 15, roughly 695 times the size of Tanybryn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fitzroy for rental income, Fitzroy for a lower purchase price, Fitzroy for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison