Skip to main content

Flemington vs Newtown

Property investment comparison - Flemington, VIC 3031 vs Newtown, VIC 3220

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Flemington wins 5, Newtown wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFlemingtonNewtown
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$525K$580K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.96%
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.25%
1-year house growth+6.5%+3.8%
3-year house growth+12.1%-9.9%
Vacancy rate2.2%0.8%
Population7,02510,445

Flemington vs Newtown: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Flemington and $1.1M in Newtown, so Flemington is the cheaper entry point, with Newtown houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Flemington sits at a median of $525K against $580K in Newtown, which makes Flemington the more affordable unit market and Newtown the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.5% in Flemington and +3.8% in Newtown, so recent momentum favours Flemington, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Flemington houses are +12.1% and Newtown houses -9.9%, so Flemington has compounded faster than Newtown over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Newtown and 2.2% in Flemington, so landlords in Newtown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Newtown is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,445 against 7,025, larger than Flemington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Flemington for a lower purchase price, Flemington for recent price momentum, Newtown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison