Skip to main content

Fletcher vs Jewells

Property investment comparison - Fletcher, NSW 2287 vs Jewells, NSW 2280

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fletcher wins 4, Jewells wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFletcherJewells
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$750K$790K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)5.11%3.50%
1-year house growth+12.2%+9.2%
3-year house growth+20.6%+32.8%
Vacancy rate2.2%3.6%
Population8,0142,452

Fletcher vs Jewells: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Fletcher and $1.1M in Jewells, so Jewells is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Fletcher sits at a median of $750K against $790K in Jewells, which makes Fletcher the more affordable unit market and Jewells the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.2% in Fletcher and +9.2% in Jewells, so recent momentum favours Fletcher, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Fletcher houses are +20.6% and Jewells houses +32.8%, so Jewells has compounded faster than Fletcher over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.2% in Fletcher and 3.6% in Jewells, so landlords in Fletcher face less competition for tenants.

Fletcher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,014 against 2,452, roughly 3.3 times the size of Jewells; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Jewells for a lower purchase price, Fletcher for recent price momentum, Fletcher for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison