Floraville vs Mount Annan
Property investment comparison - Floraville, NSW 2280 vs Mount Annan, NSW 2567
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Floraville wins 0, Mount Annan wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Floraville | Mount Annan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.14% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.50% | 4.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +8.2%estimate | +8.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.2% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 1.6% |
| Population | 1,814 | 11,784 |
Floraville vs Mount Annan: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Floraville and $1.2M in Mount Annan, so Mount Annan is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Floraville (an estimate) and +8.4% in Mount Annan, so recent momentum favours Mount Annan, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Mount Annan and 1.7% in Floraville, so landlords in Mount Annan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Mount Annan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,784 against 1,814, roughly 6 times the size of Floraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Annan for a lower purchase price, Mount Annan for recent price momentum, Mount Annan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison