Skip to main content

Floraville vs Riverstone

Property investment comparison - Floraville, NSW 2280 vs Riverstone, NSW 2765

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Floraville wins 4, Riverstone wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFloravilleRiverstone
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$910K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.14%2.90%
Gross rental yield (units)3.50%3.15%
1-year house growth+8.2%estimate+6.2%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%3.3%
Population1,8148,627

Floraville vs Riverstone: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Floraville and $1.2M in Riverstone.

On cash flow, Floraville leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.14%, compared with 2.90% in Riverstone, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.2% in Floraville (an estimate) and +6.2% in Riverstone (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Floraville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Floraville and 3.3% in Riverstone, so landlords in Floraville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Riverstone is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,627 against 1,814, roughly 4.8 times the size of Floraville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Floraville for rental income, Floraville for recent price momentum, Floraville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison