Skip to main content

Florey vs Oxley

Property investment comparison - Florey, ACT 2615 vs Oxley, ACT 2903

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Florey wins 2, Oxley wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFloreyOxley
Median house price$975K$970K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.54%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.57%
1-year house growth+5.3%-3.9%
3-year house growth+9.0%+4.1%
Vacancy rate0.6%0.1%
Population4,7811,703

Florey vs Oxley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $975K in Florey and $970K in Oxley, so Oxley is the cheaper entry point, with Florey houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Oxley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.54% in Florey, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Florey and -3.9% in Oxley, so recent momentum favours Florey, while Oxley went backwards.

Looking back three years, Florey houses are +9.0% and Oxley houses +4.1%, so Florey has compounded faster than Oxley over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Oxley and 0.6% in Florey, so landlords in Oxley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Florey is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,781 against 1,703, roughly 2.8 times the size of Oxley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oxley for rental income, Oxley for a lower purchase price, Florey for recent price momentum, Oxley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison