Skip to main content

Footscray vs Maffra West Upper

Property investment comparison - Footscray, VIC 3011 vs Maffra West Upper, VIC 3859

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Footscray wins 3, Maffra West Upper wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFootscrayMaffra West Upper
Median house price$935K$930K
Median unit price$470K$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.49%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%2.38%
1-year house growth-0.9%-
3-year house growth+1.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%2.1%
Population17,13173

Footscray vs Maffra West Upper: what the numbers say

The median house price is $935K in Footscray and $930K in Maffra West Upper, so Maffra West Upper is the cheaper entry point, with Footscray houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Footscray sits at a median of $470K against $515K in Maffra West Upper, which makes Footscray the more affordable unit market and Maffra West Upper the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Footscray and 2.1% in Maffra West Upper, so landlords in Footscray face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Footscray is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,131 against 73, roughly 235 times the size of Maffra West Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Maffra West Upper for a lower purchase price, Footscray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison