Skip to main content

Footscray vs Rosebrook

Property investment comparison - Footscray, VIC 3011 vs Rosebrook, VIC 3285

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Footscray wins 2, Rosebrook wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFootscrayRosebrook
Median house price$935K$925K
Median unit price$470K$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.49%3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)5.80%8.91%
1-year house growth-0.9%-
3-year house growth+1.1%-
Vacancy rate1.5%2.5%
Population17,131128

Footscray vs Rosebrook: what the numbers say

The median house price is $935K in Footscray and $925K in Rosebrook, so Rosebrook is the cheaper entry point, with Footscray houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Footscray sits at a median of $470K against $370K in Rosebrook, which makes Rosebrook the more affordable unit market and Footscray the pricier one.

On cash flow, Footscray leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.49%, compared with 3.25% in Rosebrook, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Footscray and 2.5% in Rosebrook, so landlords in Footscray face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Footscray is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,131 against 128, roughly 134 times the size of Rosebrook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Footscray for rental income, Rosebrook for a lower purchase price, Footscray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison