Footscray vs Weering
Property investment comparison - Footscray, VIC 3011 vs Weering, VIC 3251
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Footscray wins 3, Weering wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Footscray | Weering |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $935K | $940K |
| Median unit price | $470K | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.49% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.80% | 4.83% |
| 1-year house growth | -0.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Population | 17,131 | 62 |
Footscray vs Weering: what the numbers say
The median house price is $935K in Footscray and $940K in Weering, so Footscray is the cheaper entry point, with Weering houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Footscray sits at a median of $470K against $395K in Weering, which makes Weering the more affordable unit market and Footscray the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Footscray and 3.2% in Weering, so landlords in Footscray face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Footscray is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,131 against 62, roughly 276 times the size of Weering; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Footscray for a lower purchase price, Footscray for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison