Skip to main content

Forest Hill vs Kewarra Beach

Property investment comparison - Forest Hill, QLD 4343 vs Kewarra Beach, QLD 4879

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Forest Hill wins 2, Kewarra Beach wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricForest HillKewarra Beach
Median house price$900K$900K
Median unit price$565K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.29%4.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.09%5.35%
1-year house growth-+12.5%
3-year house growth-+35.9%
Vacancy rate1.1%1.5%
Population9356,133

Forest Hill vs Kewarra Beach: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $900K in Forest Hill and $900K in Kewarra Beach.

For units, Forest Hill sits at a median of $565K against $620K in Kewarra Beach, which makes Forest Hill the more affordable unit market and Kewarra Beach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Kewarra Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.50%, compared with 3.29% in Forest Hill, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Forest Hill and 1.5% in Kewarra Beach, so landlords in Forest Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kewarra Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,133 against 935, roughly 7 times the size of Forest Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kewarra Beach for rental income, Forest Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison