Skip to main content

Forest Lake vs Wondunna

Property investment comparison - Forest Lake, QLD 4078 vs Wondunna, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Forest Lake wins 2, Wondunna wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricForest LakeWondunna
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.56%3.61%
Gross rental yield (units)3.69%-
1-year house growth+14.8%+14.8%estimate
3-year house growth+47.3%-
Vacancy rate1.4%6.0%
Population22,6763,315

Forest Lake vs Wondunna: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Forest Lake and $1.0M in Wondunna, so Forest Lake is the cheaper entry point.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.56% in Forest Lake and 3.61% in Wondunna, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.8% in Forest Lake and +14.8% in Wondunna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wondunna, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Forest Lake and 6.0% in Wondunna, so landlords in Forest Lake face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Forest Lake is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,676 against 3,315, roughly 7 times the size of Wondunna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Forest Lake for a lower purchase price, Wondunna for recent price momentum, Forest Lake for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison