Four Mile Creek vs Pelaw Main
Property investment comparison - Four Mile Creek, NSW 2323 vs Pelaw Main, NSW 2327
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Four Mile Creek wins 1, Pelaw Main wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Four Mile Creek | Pelaw Main |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780K | $780K |
| Median unit price | $620K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.22% | 3.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.37% | 4.48% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +15.3%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| Population | 16 | 1,080 |
Four Mile Creek vs Pelaw Main: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Four Mile Creek and $780K in Pelaw Main.
On cash flow, Four Mile Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.22%, compared with 3.47% in Pelaw Main, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.6%.
Pelaw Main is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,080 against 16, roughly 68 times the size of Four Mile Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Four Mile Creek for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Four Mile Creek, NSW 2323
Open Four Mile Creek suburb profileRecent sales in Four Mile Creek
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison