Skip to main content

Four Mile Creek vs Turvey Park

Property investment comparison - Four Mile Creek, NSW 2323 vs Turvey Park, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Four Mile Creek wins 3, Turvey Park wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFour Mile CreekTurvey Park
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$620K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.22%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)4.37%3.54%
1-year house growth-+15.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%1.1%
Population163,572

Four Mile Creek vs Turvey Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Four Mile Creek and $780K in Turvey Park.

On cash flow, Four Mile Creek leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.22%, compared with 3.98% in Turvey Park, a gap of 0.24 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Four Mile Creek and 1.1% in Turvey Park, so landlords in Four Mile Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Turvey Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,572 against 16, roughly 223 times the size of Four Mile Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Four Mile Creek for rental income, Four Mile Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison