Framlingham vs Wangaratta
Property investment comparison - Framlingham, VIC 3265 vs Wangaratta, VIC 3677
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Framlingham wins 1, Wangaratta wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Framlingham | Wangaratta |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $570K | $565K |
| Median unit price | $340K | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.91% | 4.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.61% | 5.30% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 169 | 19,214 |
Framlingham vs Wangaratta: what the numbers say
The median house price is $570K in Framlingham and $565K in Wangaratta, so Wangaratta is the cheaper entry point, with Framlingham houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Framlingham sits at a median of $340K against $400K in Wangaratta, which makes Framlingham the more affordable unit market and Wangaratta the pricier one.
On cash flow, Wangaratta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.91% in Framlingham, a gap of 0.99 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.
Wangaratta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,214 against 169, roughly 114 times the size of Framlingham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wangaratta for rental income, Wangaratta for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison