Fraser Rise vs King Valley
Property investment comparison - Fraser Rise, VIC 3336 vs King Valley, VIC 3678
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fraser Rise wins 0, King Valley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fraser Rise | King Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $700K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $560K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.94% | 5.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.43% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +0.4% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.5% | 3.2% |
| Population | 9,097 | 87 |
Fraser Rise vs King Valley: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $700K in Fraser Rise and $700K in King Valley.
On cash flow, King Valley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.54%, compared with 3.94% in Fraser Rise, a gap of 1.60 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.2% in King Valley and 5.5% in Fraser Rise, so landlords in King Valley face less competition for tenants.
Fraser Rise is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,097 against 87, roughly 105 times the size of King Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: King Valley for rental income, King Valley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison