Skip to main content

Fraser Rise vs Nirranda South

Property investment comparison - Fraser Rise, VIC 3336 vs Nirranda South, VIC 3268

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fraser Rise wins 2, Nirranda South wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFraser RiseNirranda South
Median house price$700K$705K
Median unit price$560K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.94%3.66%
Gross rental yield (units)4.43%-
1-year house growth+0.4%-
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate5.5%2.3%
Population9,09790

Fraser Rise vs Nirranda South: what the numbers say

The median house price is $700K in Fraser Rise and $705K in Nirranda South, so Fraser Rise is the cheaper entry point, with Nirranda South houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Fraser Rise leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.94%, compared with 3.66% in Nirranda South, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Nirranda South and 5.5% in Fraser Rise, so landlords in Nirranda South face less competition for tenants.

Fraser Rise is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,097 against 90, roughly 101 times the size of Nirranda South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fraser Rise for rental income, Fraser Rise for a lower purchase price, Nirranda South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison