Skip to main content

Fulham vs Hackney

Property investment comparison - Fulham, SA 5024 vs Hackney, SA 5069

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fulham wins 2, Hackney wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFulhamHackney
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$700K$1.4M
Gross rental yield (houses)2.70%2.51%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+10.3%-
3-year house growth+34.2%-
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population2,920575

Fulham vs Hackney: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Fulham and $1.6M in Hackney, so Hackney is the cheaper entry point, with Fulham houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Fulham sits at a median of $700K against $1.4M in Hackney, which makes Fulham the more affordable unit market and Hackney the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fulham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.70%, compared with 2.51% in Hackney, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Hackney and 1.4% in Fulham, so landlords in Hackney face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fulham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,920 against 575, roughly 5 times the size of Hackney; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fulham for rental income, Hackney for a lower purchase price, Hackney for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison