Skip to main content

Fulham vs Parkside

Property investment comparison - Fulham, SA 5024 vs Parkside, SA 5063

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fulham wins 2, Parkside wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFulhamParkside
Median house price$1.6M$1.6M
Median unit price$700K$855K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)-3.70%
1-year house growth+10.3%+14.7%
3-year house growth+34.2%+38.9%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.1%
Population2,9205,126

Fulham vs Parkside: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.6M in Fulham and $1.6M in Parkside, so Fulham is the cheaper entry point, with Parkside houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Fulham sits at a median of $700K against $855K in Parkside, which makes Fulham the more affordable unit market and Parkside the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.3% in Fulham and +14.7% in Parkside, so recent momentum favours Parkside, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Fulham houses are +34.2% and Parkside houses +38.9%, so Parkside has compounded faster than Fulham over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Parkside and 1.4% in Fulham, so landlords in Parkside face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Parkside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,126 against 2,920, larger than Fulham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fulham for a lower purchase price, Parkside for recent price momentum, Parkside for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison