Fyansford vs Gundowring
Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Gundowring, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 3, Gundowring wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fyansford | Gundowring |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $920K |
| Median unit price | $665K | $595K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 3.74% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.19% | 3.29% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 6.0% |
| Population | 1,206 | 208 |
Fyansford vs Gundowring: what the numbers say
The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $920K in Gundowring, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Gundowring houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Fyansford sits at a median of $665K against $595K in Gundowring, which makes Gundowring the more affordable unit market and Fyansford the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.70% in Fyansford and 3.74% in Gundowring, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Fyansford and 6.0% in Gundowring, so landlords in Fyansford face less competition for tenants.
Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 208, roughly 6 times the size of Gundowring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Fyansford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison