Skip to main content

Fyansford vs Hadfield

Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Hadfield, VIC 3046

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 1, Hadfield wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFyansfordHadfield
Median house price$915K$920K
Median unit price$665K$620K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%4.75%
1-year house growth-4.7%estimate+8.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.1%
Population1,2066,269

Fyansford vs Hadfield: what the numbers say

The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $920K in Hadfield, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Hadfield houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Fyansford sits at a median of $665K against $620K in Hadfield, which makes Hadfield the more affordable unit market and Fyansford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -4.7% in Fyansford (an estimate) and +8.1% in Hadfield (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Hadfield, while Fyansford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Hadfield and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Hadfield face less competition for tenants.

Hadfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,269 against 1,206, roughly 5 times the size of Fyansford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Hadfield for recent price momentum, Hadfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison