Fyansford vs Lake Fyans
Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Lake Fyans, VIC 3381
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 2, Lake Fyans wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fyansford | Lake Fyans |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $925K |
| Median unit price | $665K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.19% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 6.3% |
| Population | 1,206 | 23 |
Fyansford vs Lake Fyans: what the numbers say
The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $925K in Lake Fyans, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Lake Fyans houses about 1% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Fyansford and 6.3% in Lake Fyans, so landlords in Fyansford face less competition for tenants.
Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 23, roughly 52 times the size of Lake Fyans; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Fyansford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison