Skip to main content

Fyansford vs Lake Goldsmith

Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Lake Goldsmith, VIC 3373

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 1, Lake Goldsmith wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFyansfordLake Goldsmith
Median house price$915K$910K
Median unit price$665K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%2.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%-
1-year house growth-4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%0.8%
Population1,20622

Fyansford vs Lake Goldsmith: what the numbers say

The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $910K in Lake Goldsmith, so Lake Goldsmith is the cheaper entry point, with Fyansford houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Fyansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.08% in Lake Goldsmith, a gap of 1.62 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Lake Goldsmith and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Lake Goldsmith face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 22, roughly 55 times the size of Lake Goldsmith; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fyansford for rental income, Lake Goldsmith for a lower purchase price, Lake Goldsmith for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison