Fyansford vs Langwarrin
Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Langwarrin, VIC 3910
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 0, Langwarrin wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fyansford | Langwarrin |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $915K |
| Median unit price | $665K | $665K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.19% | 4.46% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7%estimate | +5.6%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.4% |
| Population | 1,206 | 23,588 |
Fyansford vs Langwarrin: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $915K in Langwarrin.
Over the past year house prices moved -4.7% in Fyansford (an estimate) and +5.6% in Langwarrin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Langwarrin, while Fyansford went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Langwarrin and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Langwarrin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Langwarrin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 23,588 against 1,206, roughly 20 times the size of Fyansford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Langwarrin for recent price momentum, Langwarrin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison