Fyansford vs Monbulk
Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Monbulk, VIC 3793
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 1, Monbulk wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fyansford | Monbulk |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $910K |
| Median unit price | $665K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.19% | 2.46% |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7%estimate | +5.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 0.7% |
| Population | 1,206 | 3,651 |
Fyansford vs Monbulk: what the numbers say
The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $910K in Monbulk, so Monbulk is the cheaper entry point, with Fyansford houses about 1% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved -4.7% in Fyansford (an estimate) and +5.7% in Monbulk (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Monbulk, while Fyansford went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Monbulk and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Monbulk face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Monbulk is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,651 against 1,206, roughly 3.0 times the size of Fyansford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Monbulk for a lower purchase price, Monbulk for recent price momentum, Monbulk for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison