Skip to main content

Fyansford vs Rosebrook

Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Rosebrook, VIC 3285

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 2, Rosebrook wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFyansfordRosebrook
Median house price$915K$925K
Median unit price$665K$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%8.91%
1-year house growth-4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%2.5%
Population1,206128

Fyansford vs Rosebrook: what the numbers say

The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $925K in Rosebrook, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Rosebrook houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Fyansford sits at a median of $665K against $370K in Rosebrook, which makes Rosebrook the more affordable unit market and Fyansford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fyansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.25% in Rosebrook, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Rosebrook and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Rosebrook face less competition for tenants.

Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 128, roughly 9 times the size of Rosebrook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fyansford for rental income, Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Rosebrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison