Fyansford vs Tamleugh
Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Tamleugh, VIC 3669
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 1, Tamleugh wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Fyansford | Tamleugh |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $915K | $915K |
| Median unit price | $665K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.70% | 3.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.19% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -4.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,206 | 54 |
Fyansford vs Tamleugh: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $915K in Tamleugh.
On cash flow, Fyansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.49% in Tamleugh, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Tamleugh and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Tamleugh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 54, roughly 22 times the size of Tamleugh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fyansford for rental income, Tamleugh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison