Skip to main content

Fyansford vs Warrak

Property investment comparison - Fyansford, VIC 3218 vs Warrak, VIC 3377

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Fyansford wins 2, Warrak wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricFyansfordWarrak
Median house price$915K$925K
Median unit price$665K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%2.67%
Gross rental yield (units)4.19%7.05%
1-year house growth-4.7%estimate-
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.6%1.7%
Population1,20668

Fyansford vs Warrak: what the numbers say

The median house price is $915K in Fyansford and $925K in Warrak, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Warrak houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Fyansford sits at a median of $665K against $325K in Warrak, which makes Warrak the more affordable unit market and Fyansford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Fyansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 2.67% in Warrak, a gap of 1.03 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Warrak and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Warrak face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Fyansford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,206 against 68, roughly 18 times the size of Warrak; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fyansford for rental income, Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Warrak for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison