Skip to main content

Gailes vs Torquay

Property investment comparison - Gailes, QLD 4300 vs Torquay, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gailes wins 3, Torquay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGailesTorquay
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price-$615K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.60%4.11%
Gross rental yield (units)3.97%-
1-year house growth+23.8%+15.0%
3-year house growth+67.1%+34.0%
Vacancy rate0.7%2.0%
Population1,8316,533

Gailes vs Torquay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Gailes and $780K in Torquay.

On cash flow, Torquay leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.11%, compared with 3.60% in Gailes, a gap of 0.51 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +23.8% in Gailes and +15.0% in Torquay, so recent momentum favours Gailes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gailes houses are +67.1% and Torquay houses +34.0%, so Gailes has compounded faster than Torquay over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Gailes and 2.0% in Torquay, so landlords in Gailes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Torquay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,533 against 1,831, roughly 3.6 times the size of Gailes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Torquay for rental income, Gailes for recent price momentum, Gailes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison