Gainsborough vs Seabrook
Property investment comparison - Gainsborough, VIC 3822 vs Seabrook, VIC 3028
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gainsborough wins 0, Seabrook wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gainsborough | Seabrook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $815K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.24% | 3.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.54% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +3.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 5.0% | 1.9% |
| Population | 61 | 4,952 |
Gainsborough vs Seabrook: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $815K in Gainsborough and $815K in Seabrook.
On cash flow, Seabrook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 3.24% in Gainsborough, a gap of 0.20 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Seabrook and 5.0% in Gainsborough, so landlords in Seabrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seabrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,952 against 61, roughly 81 times the size of Gainsborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seabrook for rental income, Seabrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison