Gala Vale vs Peak Hill
Property investment comparison - Gala Vale, NSW 2716 vs Peak Hill, NSW 2869
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gala Vale wins 2, Peak Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gala Vale | Peak Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $270K | $290K |
| Median unit price | - | $265K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 8.86% | 5.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| Population | 13 | 1,162 |
Gala Vale vs Peak Hill: what the numbers say
The median house price is $270K in Gala Vale and $290K in Peak Hill, so Gala Vale is the cheaper entry point, with Peak Hill houses about 7% dearer.
On cash flow, Gala Vale leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 8.86%, compared with 5.47% in Peak Hill, a gap of 3.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Peak Hill and 0.9% in Gala Vale, so landlords in Peak Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Peak Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,162 against 13, roughly 89 times the size of Gala Vale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gala Vale for rental income, Gala Vale for a lower purchase price, Peak Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison