Skip to main content

Gapsted vs Keilor East

Property investment comparison - Gapsted, VIC 3737 vs Keilor East, VIC 3033

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gapsted wins 2, Keilor East wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGapstedKeilor East
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$505K$710K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%2.84%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%4.30%
1-year house growth-+10.8%
3-year house growth-+15.4%
Vacancy rate1.8%0.8%
Population15615,078

Gapsted vs Keilor East: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Gapsted and $1.1M in Keilor East, so Gapsted is the cheaper entry point, with Keilor East houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Gapsted sits at a median of $505K against $710K in Keilor East, which makes Gapsted the more affordable unit market and Keilor East the pricier one.

On cash flow, Keilor East leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.84%, compared with 2.73% in Gapsted, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Keilor East and 1.8% in Gapsted, so landlords in Keilor East face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Keilor East is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,078 against 156, roughly 97 times the size of Gapsted; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Keilor East for rental income, Gapsted for a lower purchase price, Keilor East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison