Skip to main content

Gapsted vs Mulgrave

Property investment comparison - Gapsted, VIC 3737 vs Mulgrave, VIC 3170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gapsted wins 2, Mulgrave wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGapstedMulgrave
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$505K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%3.14%
Gross rental yield (units)3.55%-
1-year house growth-+2.3%
3-year house growth-+14.7%
Vacancy rate1.8%1.9%
Population15619,889

Gapsted vs Mulgrave: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Gapsted and $1.1M in Mulgrave.

For units, Gapsted sits at a median of $505K against $850K in Mulgrave, which makes Gapsted the more affordable unit market and Mulgrave the pricier one.

On cash flow, Mulgrave leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.14%, compared with 2.73% in Gapsted, a gap of 0.41 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Gapsted and 1.9% in Mulgrave, so landlords in Gapsted face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Mulgrave is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,889 against 156, roughly 127 times the size of Gapsted; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mulgrave for rental income, Gapsted for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison