Garden Suburb vs Lucknow
Property investment comparison - Garden Suburb, NSW 2289 vs Lucknow, NSW 2800
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Garden Suburb wins 3, Lucknow wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Garden Suburb | Lucknow |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.80% | 2.62% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.96% | 3.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +27.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 3.4% |
| Population | 1,959 | 277 |
Garden Suburb vs Lucknow: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Garden Suburb and $1.1M in Lucknow.
On cash flow, Garden Suburb leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.62% in Lucknow, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Garden Suburb and 3.4% in Lucknow, so landlords in Garden Suburb face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Garden Suburb is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,959 against 277, roughly 7 times the size of Lucknow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Garden Suburb for rental income, Garden Suburb for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison