Skip to main content

Garden Suburb vs Oakdale

Property investment comparison - Garden Suburb, NSW 2289 vs Oakdale, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Garden Suburb wins 2, Oakdale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGarden SuburbOakdale
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price-$720K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.80%2.90%
Gross rental yield (units)3.96%4.16%
1-year house growth+11.5%+12.6%
3-year house growth+27.4%+19.7%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.0%
Population1,9592,028

Garden Suburb vs Oakdale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Garden Suburb and $1.1M in Oakdale.

On cash flow, Garden Suburb leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 2.90% in Oakdale, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Garden Suburb and +12.6% in Oakdale, so recent momentum favours Oakdale, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Garden Suburb houses are +27.4% and Oakdale houses +19.7%, so Garden Suburb has compounded faster than Oakdale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Oakdale and 1.4% in Garden Suburb, so landlords in Oakdale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oakdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,028 against 1,959, larger than Garden Suburb; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Garden Suburb for rental income, Oakdale for recent price momentum, Oakdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison