Garden Suburb vs Oakhurst
Property investment comparison - Garden Suburb, NSW 2289 vs Oakhurst, NSW 2761
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Garden Suburb wins 2, Oakhurst wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Garden Suburb | Oakhurst |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.80% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.96% | 4.30% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.5% | +8.5%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +27.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 2.7% |
| Population | 1,959 | 6,947 |
Garden Suburb vs Oakhurst: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Garden Suburb and $1.1M in Oakhurst.
Over the past year house prices moved +11.5% in Garden Suburb and +8.5% in Oakhurst (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Garden Suburb, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Garden Suburb and 2.7% in Oakhurst, so landlords in Garden Suburb face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Oakhurst is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,947 against 1,959, roughly 3.5 times the size of Garden Suburb; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Garden Suburb for recent price momentum, Garden Suburb for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison