Gateshead vs Hexham
Property investment comparison - Gateshead, NSW 2290 vs Hexham, NSW 2322
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gateshead wins 3, Hexham wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Gateshead | Hexham |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $835K | $835K |
| Median unit price | $540K | $530K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.87% | 2.76% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 7.12% | 6.24% |
| 1-year house growth | +11.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +19.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 1.6% |
| Population | 3,121 | 157 |
Gateshead vs Hexham: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $835K in Gateshead and $835K in Hexham.
For units, Gateshead sits at a median of $540K against $530K in Hexham, which makes Hexham the more affordable unit market and Gateshead the pricier one.
On cash flow, Gateshead leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.87%, compared with 2.76% in Hexham, a gap of 1.11 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gateshead and 1.6% in Hexham, so landlords in Gateshead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Gateshead is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,121 against 157, roughly 20 times the size of Hexham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gateshead for rental income, Gateshead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison