Skip to main content

Gateshead vs St Georges Basin

Property investment comparison - Gateshead, NSW 2290 vs St Georges Basin, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gateshead wins 3, St Georges Basin wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGatesheadSt Georges Basin
Median house price$835K$835K
Median unit price$540K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%3.99%
Gross rental yield (units)7.12%4.73%
1-year house growth+11.7%+5.0%estimate
3-year house growth+19.2%-
Vacancy rate0.8%2.6%
Population3,1213,215

Gateshead vs St Georges Basin: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $835K in Gateshead and $835K in St Georges Basin.

On cash flow, St Georges Basin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.99%, compared with 3.87% in Gateshead, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Gateshead and +5.0% in St Georges Basin (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Gateshead, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Gateshead and 2.6% in St Georges Basin, so landlords in Gateshead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

St Georges Basin is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,215 against 3,121, larger than Gateshead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: St Georges Basin for rental income, Gateshead for recent price momentum, Gateshead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison