Skip to main content

Gawler Belt vs Klemzig

Property investment comparison - Gawler Belt, SA 5118 vs Klemzig, SA 5087

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gawler Belt wins 1, Klemzig wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGawler BeltKlemzig
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$785K$530K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.21%-
1-year house growth+10.0%+13.0%
3-year house growth+100.0%+40.0%
Vacancy rate3.2%0.7%
Population1,0006,713

Gawler Belt vs Klemzig: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Gawler Belt and $1.1M in Klemzig, so Klemzig is the cheaper entry point, with Gawler Belt houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Gawler Belt sits at a median of $785K against $530K in Klemzig, which makes Klemzig the more affordable unit market and Gawler Belt the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.0% in Gawler Belt and +13.0% in Klemzig, so recent momentum favours Klemzig, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Gawler Belt houses are +100.0% and Klemzig houses +40.0%, so Gawler Belt has compounded faster than Klemzig over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Klemzig and 3.2% in Gawler Belt, so landlords in Klemzig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Klemzig is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,713 against 1,000, roughly 7 times the size of Gawler Belt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Klemzig for a lower purchase price, Klemzig for recent price momentum, Klemzig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison