Skip to main content

Gawler Belt vs Kurralta Park

Property investment comparison - Gawler Belt, SA 5118 vs Kurralta Park, SA 5037

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Gawler Belt wins 0, Kurralta Park wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGawler BeltKurralta Park
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$785K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.30%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)3.21%4.85%
1-year house growth+10.0%-
3-year house growth+100.0%-
Vacancy rate3.2%1.1%
Population1,0003,139

Gawler Belt vs Kurralta Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Gawler Belt and $1.1M in Kurralta Park, so Kurralta Park is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Gawler Belt sits at a median of $785K against $540K in Kurralta Park, which makes Kurralta Park the more affordable unit market and Gawler Belt the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.30% in Gawler Belt and 3.30% in Kurralta Park, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Kurralta Park and 3.2% in Gawler Belt, so landlords in Kurralta Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Kurralta Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,139 against 1,000, roughly 3.1 times the size of Gawler Belt; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Kurralta Park for a lower purchase price, Kurralta Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison