Skip to main content

Geographe vs Morley

Property investment comparison - Geographe, WA 6280 vs Morley, WA 6062

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Geographe wins 0, Morley wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeographeMorley
Median house price$985K$975K
Median unit price-$690K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%4.15%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.11%
1-year house growth+16.6%estimate+18.1%
3-year house growth-+66.2%
Vacancy rate3.4%0.7%
Population3,62222,539

Geographe vs Morley: what the numbers say

The median house price is $985K in Geographe and $975K in Morley, so Morley is the cheaper entry point, with Geographe houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Morley leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.15%, compared with 3.70% in Geographe, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Geographe (an estimate) and +18.1% in Morley, so recent momentum favours Morley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Morley and 3.4% in Geographe, so landlords in Morley face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Morley is the bigger suburb, with a population of 22,539 against 3,622, roughly 6 times the size of Geographe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Morley for rental income, Morley for a lower purchase price, Morley for recent price momentum, Morley for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison