Skip to main content

Geographe vs Yangebup

Property investment comparison - Geographe, WA 6280 vs Yangebup, WA 6164

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Geographe wins 1, Yangebup wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeographeYangebup
Median house price$985K$990K
Median unit price-$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.70%-
Gross rental yield (units)-5.01%
1-year house growth+16.6%estimate+23.6%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate3.4%0.1%
Population3,6227,631

Geographe vs Yangebup: what the numbers say

The median house price is $985K in Geographe and $990K in Yangebup, so Geographe is the cheaper entry point, with Yangebup houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +16.6% in Geographe (an estimate) and +23.6% in Yangebup (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Yangebup, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.1% in Yangebup and 3.4% in Geographe, so landlords in Yangebup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Yangebup is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,631 against 3,622, roughly 2.1 times the size of Geographe; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Geographe for a lower purchase price, Yangebup for recent price momentum, Yangebup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison