Skip to main content

Georges Hall vs Lakemba

Property investment comparison - Georges Hall, NSW 2198 vs Lakemba, NSW 2195

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Georges Hall wins 1, Lakemba wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricGeorges HallLakemba
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price$865K$540K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.77%
Gross rental yield (units)3.91%5.32%
1-year house growth+8.6%+2.3%estimate
3-year house growth+23.6%-
Vacancy rate2.2%1.5%
Population9,73917,092

Georges Hall vs Lakemba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Georges Hall and $1.5M in Lakemba, so Lakemba is the cheaper entry point, with Georges Hall houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Georges Hall sits at a median of $865K against $540K in Lakemba, which makes Lakemba the more affordable unit market and Georges Hall the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.6% in Georges Hall and +2.3% in Lakemba (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Georges Hall, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Lakemba and 2.2% in Georges Hall, so landlords in Lakemba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Lakemba is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,092 against 9,739, larger than Georges Hall; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lakemba for a lower purchase price, Georges Hall for recent price momentum, Lakemba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison